John McMenemy Prize
The John McMenemy Prize has been established in honour of the CJPS’s Administrative Editor, Professor John McMenemy (Wilfrid Laurier University) who contributed greatly to the success of the CPSA and the SQSP’s flagship journal between 1977 and 2004. The prize is awarded every year.
2021 rules
• The jury will normally consist of the two CJPS co-editors of the journal, and one member of the Board.
• The prize will be awarded to the author of the best article, in English or French, published in volume 53 of CJPS.
• The winner will be announced at the 2021 CPSA Conference.
• The winner will be awarded five CPSA and SQSP 2022 memberships to be distributed to five students.
2021 Prize Jury Members:
Cameron Anderson (Western University, Co-editor)
Mélanie Bourque (UQO, Co-editor)
Denis Saint-Martin (Université de Montréal, Board member)
2020 John McMenemy Prize
In this article, Luc Turgeon, Antoine Bilodeau, Stephen E. White and Ailsa Henderson engage a timely question at the heart . . .
Read More
2019 John McMenemy Prize
Melanee Thomas’ timely and original article examines whether gendered patterns of leader selection are the …
Read More
2018 John McMenemy Prize
Starting with Lord Durham’s bold affirmation that municipal institutions constitute the “foundations of liberty and of …
Read More
2017 John McMenemy Prize
This imaginative and wide-ranging analysis examines the model of human-animal relations put forward in . . .
Read More
2016 John McMenemy Prize
This paper provides unique and original insight into the complex factors that influence Aboriginal . . .
Read More
2015 John McMenemy Prize
Sabin’s paper draws from settler colonial literature to examine the unique historical case of the settler . . .
Read More
2005 John McMenemy Prize
The authors present a convincing critique of the major methods of measuring democratic development and . . .
Read More 2014 John McMenemy Prize
The nature of contemporary anti-abortion discourse in Canada is the topic of this original and fascinating . . .
Read More 2013 John McMenemy Prize
A remarkable example of counterfactual analysis examining the validity of widely held political interpretations and . . .
Read More